Windows vs Apple: What Can Windows Offer That Apple Lacks?

In discussions about the merits of operating systems, one often hears that Windows is more flexible and versatile compared to MacOS. This article delves into the specific advantages that Windows can offer over Apple, especially in terms of gaming performance, touchscreen capabilities, and hardware flexibility.

Gaming Performance

Windows excels in gaming performance due to its compatibility with a vast array of hardware specifications. Unlike MacOS, which is limited to a handful of devices, Windows can run on millions of different configurations from hundreds of PC manufacturers. A prime example of this is the Dell XPS 15, which features an OLED display, 32GB RAM, and an Intel i7/9 processor paired with a NVIDIA GTX 1060. This powerful combination is unbeatable for any top-tier gaming experience.

In comparison, many lower and medium-tier Macs rely on integrated graphics, which are significantly weaker in terms of visual performance. For instance, an 13-inch MacBook often lacks a dedicated graphics processing unit (dGPU), resulting in poor performance for tasks like video editing and processing. On the other hand, the Surface Book 2 with a dGPU can offer a much smoother user experience, although it is not without occasional bugs.

Touchscreen Capabilities

Windows offers superior touch and pen integration, providing a more versatile computing experience. This is particularly beneficial in the hybrid devices like tablets that can seamlessly switch between keyboard and touch modes. Furthermore, Windows boasts a comprehensive touch and pen-focused operating system that enhances the digital creative experience.

Conversely, MacOS does not support the same level of touchscreen and pen functionality, limiting its appeal to users looking for a more intuitive and flexible interaction method.

Hardware Flexibility

One of the standout features of Windows is its unmatched hardware flexibility. Users can build their own computers or choose from an incredibly diverse selection of off-the-shelf hardware. A simple example is the ability to run high-end Blender, GIMP, and Photoshop applications on a Windows machine, demonstrating the system's versatility in professional software environments.

In contrast, MacOS is limited to a finite number of devices manufactured by Apple, all of which must meet the company's strict specifications. This one-size-fits-all approach can be restrictive for users who seek more customizable hardware solutions.

The flexibility of Windows also extends to its ability to work on a wide range of devices. For example, a keyboardless tablet running Windows can be connected to multiple large monitors, creating a multi-monitor setup that is not easily achievable on MacOS. This hybrid nature makes Windows a more adaptable choice for both desktop and mobile work.

Conclusion

In the grand scale of operating system discussions, it is clear that Windows significantly outperforms MacOS in terms of gaming performance, touchscreen capabilities, and hardware flexibility. While Apple offers a sleek and integrated experience, Windows provides the tools and flexibility necessary for a wide range of users looking for the most performance and customization.

Instead of competing, the question should be: How can Mac improve to compete with the Windows operating system? After all, Windows enjoys a substantial user base and a competitive edge in the industry.