The Fixed Constitution: Understanding the True Intent and Meaning
In the debate around the U.S. Constitution, many argue that it should either be strictly interpreted or can be amended as needed. However, the framers of the Constitution specifically ordained its fixed nature to ensure enduring liberties and the rule of law.
Understanding Amendments
The Article 5 of the Constitution explicitly states that only amendments to the Constitution are allowed, not alterations of the Constitution. It underscores that individuals who hold office under this document must be swears to uphold it as written.
American Founding Principles
America was founded based on an understanding that governments are established to protect individual rights endowed by their Creator. The Constitution was a blueprint to safeguard these unalienable rights. By swearing an oath of office, officials affirm their support and defense of this document, not its changeability.
Consistency through Court Rulings
Several Supreme Court cases have reinforced the unwavering nature of the Constitution. These cases emphasize that the Constitution is a written instrument and its meaning remains constant over time.
Key Court Rulings and Quotes
In South Carolina v. U.S. 199 US 437, the Supreme Court stated:
“The Constitution is a written instrument. As such its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted it means now…”
Similarly, in Downes v. Bidwill 182 U.S. 244, the Court emphasized:
“It will be an evil day for American liberty if the theory of a government outside of the supreme law of the land finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence.”
The Federalist Papers, considered a divine commentary on the Constitution, are often cited as authoritative. In Cohens v. Virginia 6 Wheat. 264 387 in 1821, the Court quoted:
“And in the words of Chief Justice Marshall they were secured “for ages to come and . . . designed to approach immortality as nearly as human institutions can approach it.””
The Supreme Court has consistently recognized the duty to protect constitutional rights. Byars v. U.S. 273 US 28 1927 highlighted:
“The duty of the courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen and against any stealthy encroachment thereon.”
Furthermore, Boyd v. United States 116 US 616 Page 635 reinforces the rationale behind vigilant protection of constitutional rights:
“It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen and against any stealthy encroachment thereon.”
In Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 page 442, the Court declared:
“An Unconstitutional Act is not law; it confers no rights: it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”
Yet another case, Miranda vs. Arizona 384 US 436 page 491, underscores the importance of adhering to constitutional guarantees:
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.”
A Deeper Look into Presidential Warnings
Presidential warnings also reflect the gravity of maintaining a fixed Constitution. According to President John Adams:
“Our Constitution was made only for a religious and moral people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other.”
Conclusion
The Constitution remains a cornerstone of American liberty because it was designed to be a fixed document with a clear intent. Any alteration to its fundamental principles would undermine the very foundation of the nation. Through the consistent decision-making of the Supreme Court and influential writings like the Federalist Papers, the true meaning and intent of the Constitution are preserved for future generations.
For those interested in further insights and research, please read my essays on the subject.
-