The Dilemma of Choosing Between Donald Trump and Dick Cheney in a 2020 Election Scenario

Introduction

The upcoming 2020 presidential election poses many intriguing hypotheticals, especially when placebos like Donald Trump and Dick Cheney run against each other. This article explores the complexities of voter choice and reasoning in such a scenario, as well as delves into the potential outcomes and societal impacts.

Note: This piece is purely speculative and used for discussing the dynamics of voter behavior in hypothetical scenarios.

A Vote for the Dogs

While many might argue the merits of choosing a viable candidate, some might prefer a more lighthearted approach. In a moment of whimsy or frustration, No decided to vote for their dog's name in the 2016 election, a decision that could be replicated in a 2020 scenario. This illustrates the sometimes irrational or humorous aspects of voting, even in serious elections.

Darth Vader vs. Darth Cheeto

Another intriguing hypothetical involves comparing Donald Trump to Darth Vader, a powerful Sith Lord from the Star Wars universe. However, the comparison is somewhat flawed, given that Darth Cheeto, a slang term used to call Trump, is more fitting. Both candidates share a Republican party affiliation, but one could argue against the other based on various principles. Cheney, often depicted as a political vilain, stands as the more ominous choice, symbolizing the 'chaotic evil' that some might fear.

Civilized vs. Chaotic Evil

Some might suggest that civilization would require voting for the lesser of two evils, but others might argue for more noble choices. One No suggested voting for the devil, a hyperbolic statement that emphasizes the extreme disapproval of both candidates. This rationale reflects the frustration and disillusionment many voters feel during election periods.

In a more real scenario, No would vote for the Democratic candidate, aligning with the party that traditionally represents a more inclusive and progressive agenda. The notion of having Cheney return to politics is described as frightening, indicating a deep-seated fear of political figures associated with chaotic evil.

Deterring Evil

It would be tempting to vote for someone based on their deterrent value, such as someone who could prevent a more dangerous figure from governing. However, both Trump and Cheney have already demonstrated their capacity for malevolence. In such a scenario, voting for neither candidate and staying home might be the most effective way to avoid endorsing anyone evil or criminal.

Ultimately, the choice of whether to vote or not is a personal and principled decision. In the hypothetical scenario presented, the decision to abstain from voting could be seen as a stance against endorsing evil, reflecting a broader societal value of moral integrity in governance.

Conclusion

The hypothetical scenario of a 2020 election with Donald Trump and Dick Cheney provides ample food for thought regarding voter behavior and choice. While the scenario is purely speculative, it highlights the complexities of political decision-making and the importance of principled voting. Whether choosing a different candidate, abstaining from voting, or opting for a more whimsical choice, each option carries its own set of reasoning and implications.