The Debate: Why Schools Teach Art and Music Over Programming

For generations, schools have prioritized teaching art and music over programming. This decision is often rooted in tradition, budgetary constraints, and misconceptions about what skills are essential. However, in an increasingly digital world, the question arises: why are schools still favoring art and music when there are clear benefits to integrating programming education?

Historical Context

Arts and music have been around for hundreds of years, while computing and programming are recent inventions. These traditional subjects, such as art and music, have stood the test of time due to their intrinsic value and ability to foster creative expression and identity exploration. In contrast, programming, while a cornerstone of modern society, has only gained prominence in recent decades. As a result, many schools still prioritize the time-honored disciplines of art and music, viewing them as essential for personal growth and well-being.

Traditional Beliefs

Many schools continue to teach art and music because they believe that these subjects enhance students' ability to express themselves and provide a deeper understanding of their identity. These creative outlets allow students to explore their emotions, imagination, and individuality, which is crucial for their overall development.

Current Concerns and Arguments

My main argument is that there are not yet enough educators in programming and related fields. This shortage can make it difficult for schools to implement comprehensive programming curriculums. Additionally, programming education requires significant resources, such as updated technology and specialized teachers, which may not be readily available in all school districts.

However, as an artist who has transitioned into programming, I can attest to the invaluable skills that art education provides. Understanding complex reasoning, image material technique, and creative problem-solving are skills that translate seamlessly into programming. Artistic education teaches students to think outside the box and approach challenges from different angles, making programming second nature in a way that might be impossible without a foundational artistic background.

Modern Trends and Concerns

I am increasingly worried about the trend in Ireland, where schools are shutting down art classes and replacing them with programming. Both art and programming are invaluable and relevant skills that offer extensive benefits. Shutting down art classes and replacing them with programming, especially in the developmental phase of life, could be detrimental to students' creative and cognitive development.

Additionally, school boards often have limited understanding of what students can do with computers, which can lead to outdated perceptions of computing and programming. Their ideas of technology often come from popular media and Hollywood depictions, which may not accurately reflect the practical applications and ethical considerations of digital skills.

Conclusion

The decision to prioritize art and music over programming in schools reflects a complex interplay of historical context, budgetary constraints, and misconceptions. However, in an era where technology and digital skills are increasingly crucial, it is essential to reassess and integrate programming education into the curriculum. By doing so, schools can equip students with the skills needed to thrive in the modern world while continuing to foster creativity and personal growth.