Nikon 105mm f/2.5 vs Tamron 90mm f/2.8: Which is the Better Macro Lens?
When it comes to choosing the right macro lens, Nikon enthusiasts often find themselves torn between the Nikon 105mm f/2.8 macro lens and the Tamron 90mm f/2.8. This comparison aims to unravel the intricacies of these two lenses to help you make an informed decision. Both lenses are marvels in their own right, but which one stands out for its performance and value for money?
Resolution and Bokeh
Both lenses offer impressive resolution, but the Nikkor 105mm f/2.5 shines in terms of sharpness and resolution from f/2.8, which is a significant advantage for technical and astro photography. The Nikkor also boasts a very small textbook Point Spread Function (PSF), making it ideal for high-resolution imaging. According to our evaluation, lateral chromatic aberration (CA) control in the Nikkor is superior to almost any non-apochromatic lens, further enhancing its performance.
The Tamron 90mm f/2.8 is a specialized macro lens, akin to the Nikkor Micro 55/2.8, but with a longer focal length. While it still offers excellent resolution, the Tamron struggles slightly with distorted bokeh and flare resistance, particularly when compared to the Nikkor. However, the Tamron's superior curvature of field correction in macro use can be a notable advantage.
Usability and Flexibility
On the other hand, the Nikkor 105mm f/2.5 is a manual focus lens and is designated as AI-S, meaning it may not work on all modern Nikon bodies. This can be a limitation for users who primarily use newer models. Additionally, the Nikkor is not designed for true macro photography, making it unsuitable for subjects that require greater magnification.
Build Quality and Value for Money
Build quality is another crucial factor to consider. The Tamron lenses are known for their cost-effective nature without compromising on quality. While not all Tamron lenses are top-notch, the Tamron 90mm f/2.8 is exceptionally good, offering comparable performance to branded Canon and Nikon lenses. The Tamron macro lens is sturdy and durable, making it a reliable choice for long-term use.
In terms of value for money, the Tamron 90mm f/2.8 is a clear winner. It provides sharpness and versatility that rival the Nikkor, but at a more affordable price point. While the Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 is a high-end lens with exceptional mechanical and performance consistency, it comes at a higher cost, which may not be justified for all users.
Conclusion
Choosing between the Nikkor 105mm f/2.5 and the Tamron 90mm f/2.8 ultimately comes down to your specific needs and preferences. The Nikkor lens is a high-quality, dependable choice, especially for technical and astro photography. However, the Tamron 90mm f/2.8 offers a better balance of build quality, value for money, and versatility, making it an excellent choice for those looking for a premium macro lens at a more affordable price.
For a more detailed comparison, consider comparing the Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED with the Tamron. This alternative offers a great deal of flexibility and is a robust lens for macro photography.